jevmodel.org account

Sign in for 100,000 free input tokens

About 500 Jev requests in the playground or from your own code with an API key. Packs start at $9.90 when you need more. No card required.

By signing in you agree to our terms. We only use your email for your account.
Jev Model · Routing & decisions

Intent Classification

Know what the customer wants before the bot answers.

Send a chat message and your list of intents and get back the main intent, a hand-off probability and an urgency score. Your bot or router can branch on the result in a single call instead of parsing a generated sentence.

One statefocused questions
  • MessageThe latest customer message, with recent turns if useful
  • IntentsThe intents your bot can handle, each with a short definition
  • Hand-off ruleWhen a person should take over
Structured answersfor your application
  • Intenttrack order · product question · return · other
  • Hand-off probabilitynoul: a human should take over
  • Urgency scorescore: low to high

Try it with your own rules

Start from the preset below, adapt the questions, and inspect the typed answers. Run it live in the playground — it is the same request shape your application will send.

ChoiceWhat does the customer mainly want?
Yes / NoShould a human agent take over?
ScoreHow urgent is this conversation?
Open in playground

What Jev returns

Illustrative output for the preset below — run it live to get real values for your input.

message

hi — my order #A-8271 was supposed to arrive last Friday and tracking has not moved in 6 days. can someone check? also is the blue version coming back in stock?

From one example to a reusable workflow

01

List only the intents you can act on

Each intent should map to a flow, an answer or a queue you actually have. Keep an explicit "other" so unrelated messages have somewhere to go.

02

Treat hand-off as its own decision

Whether a person should take over is not the same question as what the customer wants. Ask it separately and set its threshold from the cost of a bad bot answer.

03

Log the second intent

The probability map often shows two real intents (here: tracking and stock). Route on the first and let the bot acknowledge the second.

Keep the criteria separate

CheckWhat it measuresHow to use it
Intent · ChoiceWhat does the customer mainly want?Definitions are the routing table — merge intents that lead to the same action.
Hand-off · Yes/NoShould a person take over?Lower the threshold for high-value or angry customers; raise it for routine questions.
Urgency · ScoreHow time-sensitive is it?Use it to order the human queue, not to decide whether the bot answers.
01

The problem

Intent classifiers trained for one domain break when the product changes, and generative models return prose you have to parse. A typed intent over your own labels is easier to test and to change.

02

Change the labels, not the model

Adding an intent is an edit to the request, not a retraining job. Measure each change on a set of labelled messages before it ships.

03

Pair it with a generator when needed

Use Jev for the branch, then call a general LLM only on the intents that need a written reply. The cheap decision decides whether the expensive call is needed.

FAQ

How many intents can I define?

A choice question accepts up to 255 options, but accuracy and maintenance are better with a short, well-defined list of the intents you can act on.

Does it work in other languages?

The same request shape works across languages. Keep the question and option definitions in one language and test it on messages from each market.

How is this different from support triage?

Intent routing decides what a chatbot should do with a message. Support triage decides which human queue owns a ticket and how urgent it is.

API keys

Call Jev with your key.

Send state plus typed questions to the local Jev endpoint. Successful requests charge input tokens. Add an Idempotency-Key header when retrying.

+ New key